Interim Board meeting Minutes/8 November 2004

From GovernanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


Prior:
1 November 2004
Interim Board meeting Minutes Next:
6 December 2004


Minutes approved: 6 December 2004

This document is a board working paper, and commercial in confidence.

Present
Geoff Halprin, Lorette Cheswick, David Parter, Trey Harris
Meeting
2004-11-08 1900 US/East
Opened
19:00
Closed
20:36

Consent Agenda

  • Meeting minutes (2004-11-01) approved by consent.

Action Items

  • See action item list.

Election Policy Decisions Discussion

  • To be decided:
  • Election terms and term limits.
  • Bylaw amendments.
  • Size of membership quorum: 1/10 or 1/20.
  • Size of board quorum.
  • Election Terms and Term Limits
  • Geoff: 2 or 3 years ok. Limit at 8 years.
  • Too long and you lose touch; industry moved too much.
  • Trey: 2 or 3 years. No term limits.
  • Term limits are undemocratic. Solve the wrong problem.
  • (Would need to be large. e.g. 12 yrs.)
  • We want to encourage "up through the ranks" progression where someone is general, then officer, then pres.
  • David: 2 year term.
  • Need term limit. Known name can hang on too long.
  • Members are unaware of board problems.
  • 3 terms (6 yrs) is about right.
  • Past President handles continuity issue.
  • Lorette:
  • Term limits good and bad.
  • Needed to remove someone.
  • Good person denied.
  • Don't care; it's really for the nomcomm and training.
  • Terms for X years, but:
  • Need to rotate positions.
  • 8-12 year limits.
  • Vote: 2 year terms. Unanimous.
  • Vote: No term limits. Failed.
  • 8 years: Failed.
  • More discussion ensued.
  • 10 years: Trey, -David, Lorette, Geoff.
  • No limits: Trey, David, Lorette, Geoff.
  • Address downsides through nomcomm, board training.
  • Past President
  • Trey:
  • Problem: Unpopular past president. (who couldn't be reelected)
  • David:
  • If membership does not elect position, then no.
  • Lorette:
  • Non-voting role. solved.
  • Geoff:
  • One-year handover capacity. Non-voting.
  • Issue deferred.
  • Size of board and quorum, officers, executive committee.
  • NJ Officers: Pres, Treas/Sec
  • Trey:
  • Board size: 7 or 9.
  • Quorum: 51% of filled seats.
  • Vote: Majority of those voting (excl. abstensions).
  • Officers:
  • Pres, VP/Sec, Treas (but treas/sec ok).
  • Lorette:
  • Size: 7
  • Quorum: majority of filled seats.
  • Vote: Simple majority of those voting.
  • (IPP would take away a spot on a small board.)
  • Officers:
  • Pres, sec, treas, vp.
  • EC: willing to try 3.
  • David:
  • Size: 7 or 9. Leaning towards 9. 8 ok.
  • Quorum: Majority of filled seats.
  • Vote: Majority of those voting (excl. abstensions).
  • Officers: VP as leadership development role.
  • Pres/treas co-sign money.
  • EC: Leave composition of exec comm. to board.
  • What is role of EC?
  • Geoff:
  • Size: 7-9. Leaning towards 9.
  • Quorum: ditto
  • Vote: ditto
  • Officers: Pres, Sec/Treas (compliance), other.
  • Sec/Treas is compliance. (Staff do this.)
  • VP is pres in training.
  • Personality issue. (Treas often doesn't make good Pres.)
  • Paradox: sec/treas most trained.
  • 3-person exec committee: Pres, Sec/Treas, VP.
  • Trey:
  • Youth member. 8+1?
  • Lorette:
  • Proportional voting and nomcomm can fix this.
  • Use the advisory board.
  • Geoff:
  • And election materials.
  • Officers: Pres, VP, Sec/Treas. Unanimous.
  • Size: 9. Unanimous.
  • Quorum: 51% of filled seats. Unanimous.
  • Vote: Majority of those voting (excl. abstensions). Unanimous.
  • EC: deferred.
  • To be decided:
  • Size of membership quorum: 1/10 or 1/20.
  • Bylaw amendments


Meeting closed
20:36